Case Study: Assessing the Practicality and Utility of Kites

Assessing the Practicality and Utility of Kites as Aerial Photography Platforms:

Historical Context, Field Applications, and Future Prospects
(Order of the Great Fifth Sea, Technical Paper No. 17, 2025 Concord Edition)


Executive Summary

Kite Aerial Photography (KAP), though sometimes dismissed as a quaint contrivance from a bygone age, remains—under the discerning eye of the Order—a viable, elegant, and surprisingly potent means of securing high-resolution aerial imagery. In an era obsessed with buzzing, battery-hungry unmanned craft, the kite offers a quieter, more ceremonious ascent into the sky, requiring neither propeller nor petroleum. This paper examines the historical lineage of KAP, its continued relevance for scientific, ecological, and archival work, and its peculiar congruence with the Order’s ethos: practical utility wrapped in the charm of deliberate anachronism.

While acknowledging the meteoric rise of UAVs, this study affirms that kites retain unmatched strengths in operational simplicity, minimal environmental footprint, and certain wind-blessed field conditions. The Order contends that—properly executed with robust rigs and sound seamanship—KAP is not merely “good enough” but, in some circumstances, the superior tool. Our recommendations emphasize optimal deployment strategies, technical integration with modern imaging, and an unapologetic embrace of heritage equipment.


Introduction: The Sky on a String

From Champlain’s Mer Douce to the Order’s present-day Concord Sessions, the fascination with surveying from above has never waned. Long before the whir of rotors and the flicker of satellite downlinks, the simple kite—a length of line, a panel of canvas or silk, a stout wooden spar—offered explorers and surveyors their first taste of the aerial perspective.

The Order finds in kites a kindred spirit: accessible, resilient, and pleasingly mechanical. They require no software updates, cannot be bricked by firmware, and possess a kind of mechanical honesty—what the wind gives, it gives freely.


Historical Origins and the Order’s Perspective

Kite aerial photography emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries alongside meteorological studies that trusted their instruments to the breeze. Early practitioners lashed large-format cameras to the line, sometimes triggering them with clockwork timers worthy of a horologist’s bench.

The Order retains several such devices in its archive, including a 1908 brass-and-mahogany Thornton-Pickard shutter rig—restored to working order for the 2019 Rawley Point shoreline mapping project. Our continued use of these vintage instruments is less about sentimentality and more about resilience; a device with no microchip is one immune to most forms of obsolescence.


Field Applications: A Quiet Rival to the Drone

The utility of kites in contemporary research remains understated. In ecological monitoring along the Great Fifth Sea’s shifting dunes, Order teams have deployed delta kites fitted with modern mirrorless cameras to capture sub-centimeter imagery—without disturbing nesting birds or earning the ire of park wardens enforcing UAV restrictions.

Likewise, in archaeological surveys of shoreline midden sites, the kite’s silent, steady hover allows for repeated passes over delicate terrain without risk of rotor wash or exhaust contamination.


Comparative Analysis with Modern Methods

Where satellites offer sweeping, dispassionate panoramas, and UAVs promise maneuverability and immediacy, kites offer a third path: patient, deliberate, and devoid of electronic fuss. They operate in wind, not Wi-Fi. Their environmental impact is negligible—unless one counts the occasional startled gull.

KAP also sidesteps the growing thicket of UAV regulations. In the eyes of certain harbormasters and rangers, a kite is still more “toy” than “threat,” though the Order advises discretion: our survey kites are emblazoned with the Hollow Compass to deter both curiosity and confiscation.


Recommendations for Order Operations

  1. Kite Selection: Favor vintage patterns—rokkaku or Pearson roller—for their lift and stability in variable winds. The use of silk, hemp line, and hand-lathed spars is encouraged where conditions allow.

  2. Camera Integration: Pair heritage rigs with modern sensors; a brass gimbal can cradle a mirrorless body just as well as it once did a folding Kodak.

  3. Wind Discipline: Assign a Windkeeper to each expedition—responsible for reading the lake breeze and vetoing launches in capricious weather.

  4. Archival Method: All imagery to be printed on fiber-based photographic paper and logged in the Aligned Ledger alongside digital storage.


Conclusion: The Value of Slow Flight

In the balance between progress and tradition, the Order finds KAP not merely a relic but a living practice—a method that, with due ceremony and skill, produces data of exceptional clarity while embodying our preference for tools that outlast trends. Where drones race the wind, kites converse with it. Where modernity seeks efficiency, we occasionally seek poetry.

Thus, the kite remains in our field kit—not as a curiosity, but as a trusted companion to compass, sextant, and sturdy boots.

References

McAuliffe, C. P., Lage, K., & Mattke, R. (2017). Access to Online Historical Aerial Photography Collections: Past Practice, Present State, and Future Opportunities. In Journal of Map & Geography Libraries (Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 198–221). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2017.1334252

Howes, W., & Miles, R. (1963). Aerial Photography Applied to Traffic Studies : Technical Paper. Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313627

(1904). Meteorological observations obtained by the use of kites off the West Coast of Scotland, 1902. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Vol. 72, Issues 477–486, pp. 13–15). The Royal Society. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1903.0005

Lombard, M., Caruana, M. V., van der Walt, J., & Högberg, A. (2020). The Keimoes 3 desert kite site, South Africa: an aerial lidar and micro-topographic exploration. In Antiquity (Vol. 94, Issue 373, pp. 197–211). Antiquity Publications. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.99

Bryson, M., Johnson-Roberson, M., Murphy, R. J., & Bongiorno, D. (2013). Kite Aerial Photography for Low-Cost, Ultra-high Spatial Resolution Multi-Spectral Mapping of Intertidal Landscapes. In S. Thrush (Ed.), PLoS ONE (Vol. 8, Issue 9, p. e73550). Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073550

Currier, K. (2014). Mapping with strings attached: Kite aerial photography of Durai Island, Anambas Islands, Indonesia. In Journal of Maps (Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 589–597). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.925839

Shearn, I., & Heckenberger, M. J. (2020). Participatory Mapping of Mid-Holocene Anthropogenic Landscapes in Guyana with Kite Aerial Photography. In Global Journal of Human-Social Science (pp. 1–15). Global Journals. https://doi.org/10.34257/gjhssdvol20is4pg1

Bethel, J., Johnson, S., & Prezzi, M. (2005). Modern Technologies for Design Data Collection. Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313273

Pop, S., Ceocea, C., Cioacă, C., Prisacariu, V., Boșcoianu, M., Vlădareanu, V., & Vladareanu, L. (2020). Aerial Mechatronic Systems for Collection of Atmospheric and Environmental Data. In International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) (Vol. 14, Issue 10, p. 139). International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i10.15257

B., R., E., S., H., M., & N., S. (2012). Earth Observation – Space Technology. In Earth Observation. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/27665

Ruiz Sabina, J. Á., Gallego Valle, D., Peña Ruiz, C., Molero García, J. M., & Gómez Laguna, A. (2015). Aerial Photogrammetry by drone in archaeological sites with large structures. Methodological approach and practical application in the medieval castles of Campo de Montiel. In Virtual Archaeology Review (Vol. 6, Issue 13, p. 5). Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2015.4366

Abate, D., & Murtiyoso, A. (2019). BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF UNORDERED AERIAL DATASET COLLECTED THROUGH KITE PLATFORM. In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences: Vol. XLII-2/W17 (pp. 1–8). Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w17-1-2019

Laroche, H. (2020). Observation as photography: A metaphor. In M@n@gement (Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 79–99). Association Internationale de management strategique (AIMS). https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v23i3.5513

Nakamura, K., Yamakami, M., Harima, T., & Wakabayashi, S. (1972). Recording System of Photographing Time for an Aerial Camera. In Journal of the Japan society of photogrammetry (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 25–28). Japan Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.4287/jsprs1962.11.2_25

Anderson, K., Griffiths, D., DeBell, L., Hancock, S., Duffy, J. P., Shutler, J. D., Reinhardt, W. J., & Griffiths, A. (2016). A Grassroots Remote Sensing Toolkit Using Live Coding, Smartphones, Kites and Lightweight Drones. In K. P. Vadrevu (Ed.), PLOS ONE (Vol. 11, Issue 5, p. e0151564). Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151564

Clevers, J. G. P. W. (1988). Multispectral aerial photography as a supplemental technique in agricultural research. In Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science (Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 75–90). Wageningen University and Research. https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v36i1.16699

RADULESCU, M., & VLADAREANU, V. (2017). AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND THE USE OF PHOTO CAMERAS ATTACHED TO DRONES. In SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCE (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 201–206). Henri Coanda Air Force Academy. https://doi.org/10.19062/2247-3173.2017.19.1.22

Oneață, D., & Cucu, H. (2019). Kite: Automatic Speech Recognition for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In Interspeech 2019 (pp. 2998–3002). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2019-1390

Li, D., Li, Q., Tang, L., Yang, S., Cheng, N., & Song, J. (2015). Invariant Observer-Based State Estimation for Micro-Aerial Vehicles in GPS-Denied Indoor Environments Using an RGB-D Camera and MEMS Inertial Sensors. In Micromachines (Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 487–522). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi6040487

(2016). Collecting Data. In Quality and Reliability Engineering International (Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 333–333). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1974

Commentary & Marginalia – Order Discussion Ledger

(Extracted from post-publication discourse among Members)


R.M.
“Excellent paper, Concordant. The balance between historical reverence and operational utility is spot-on. I particularly commend the reminder that the kite is immune to firmware obsolescence. That line should be engraved somewhere, perhaps on the kite reel itself.”


J.T.
“Yes, yes, but more mention could have been made of the sheer joy factor. Watching a rokkaku settle into a steady hover over the lake is equal parts cartography and therapy. The paper is academically sound, but we mustn’t forget the poetry—wind as co-author.”


C.L.
“I move that we consider a field demonstration at the Soar on the Shore festival. While primarily a public-facing event, it offers ample opportunity for reconnaissance of contemporary kite culture, not to mention outreach potential. And the beach is favorable for launch.”


B.H.
“Seconded. The optics would be excellent—Order members in vintage windbreakers with brass theodolites, operating a proper mapping rig amidst a sea of nylon deltas and inflatable octopi. The contrast would speak volumes.”


M.G.
“Caution: festivals invite questions. Are we prepared to answer ‘What are you doing?’ fifty times an hour while maintaining plausible scholarly detachment? And will the modern sport kite pilots appreciate our preference for hemp line and wooden reels?”


(Redacted)


S.K.
“I suggest an internal drill first—‘Operation Public Breeze’—to rehearse engagement protocols. We need to ensure we don’t overshare archival coordinates or reveal the full extent of our shoreline mapping projects.”


Order Clerk’s Note
Consensus trending toward attendance, pending logistical review and member availability. Action item: secure lodging in Algoma and investigate the possibility of securing a designated launch sector to avoid entanglements with sport kite